![]() ![]() 1901 et seq., and the validity of implementing regulations promulgated by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) in its 2016 Final Rule (Final Rule). In this case, the en banc court considered the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 25 U.S.C.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |